frandroid

CONTENT WARNING: Discussion of literal torture and domestic violence, and metaphorical sexual violence. No graphic description of either, but discussion of both.


I had promised a podcast transcript which I thought I would post last Friday, but it was long and I could not finish it off then. Then as I was transcribing it I started to sour on it. This is an interview done by Volodymyr Yermolenko, who is a Ukrainian philosopher and host of this Explaining Ukraine podcast, of Marci Shore, who is an associate professor at Yale where she is teaching modern European intellectual history. Shore is Timothy Snyder's wife, the Yale history prof who teaches about the Holocaust and Modern East European history. I have just finished listening to his Ukrainian history course's lectures. His whole teaching is wrapped around imperialism though it's not particularly Marxist, but it's really good. I'll make a post about that series later. I've also listened to Shore on a number of podcasts and she's always giving the same interview, which is a summary of her 2014 book Ukrainian Night. It's about how she fell in love with the partly failed Ukrainian revolutions of 2004 and 2013, where both times Ukrainians managed to push back against Viktor Yanukovych and Russian influence, but not against oligarchs and corruption. (She also guest-lectured in her husband's course where she taught the same course/interview.)

So here Shore gives more of her back story of how she, an American bougie suburban Jewish woman became an East European scholar. I enjoyed it but I don't particularly recommend that you listen to this hour-long interview. However there was this striking conclusion which kind of blew my mind, and then later on made me really annoyed. She thinks it's a great feminist gotcha that Belarusians discuss President Lukashenko as a metaphorical perpetrator of sexual violence on the population through his authoritarian reign. There is a liberalism to her that really gets under my skin, it's hard to put a finger on it but it's more salient here. Amusingly though unintentionally, the host debunks this, saying that this politics as sexual violence discourse is routine in Eastern Europe. Maybe I missed the point. But anyway I still thought it was interesting, though more about authoritarianism in Russia, and I'm still struggling to figure out how and why she made the transition from authoritarianism to torture and domestic violence, but it's intense. She is big on Hannah Arendt, who I haven't read, so maybe that makes sense to other people. I've slightly edited this to eliminate repetitions and remove some of the "hum" type sentences of spoken word.

( The Interview )

This interview: https://podcastaddict.com/episode/150292985

Shore's lecture on the Maidan: https://podcastaddict.com/episode/149147534

Another interview where she expands on the same discussion as this post, in case it grabs you: https://podcastaddict.com/episode/145505577

---
#PodcastFriday is a tag where people recommend a particularly good episode from a podcast. The point of this tag is NOT to recommend entire podcasts--there are too many podcasts out there, and our queues are already too long, so don't do that. Let's just recommend the cream of the crop, the episodes that made you *brainsplode* or laugh like crazy. Copy this footer so people don't start recommending whole podcasts. :P

I'm back from spending the holidays in Québec City.

Toronto Star: Protesters condemn Israeli violence. Lame article, but a witness to it nonetheless. Globe and Mail: Canadians take to streets to protest air strikes

Israel is trying to re-establish its manhood: Israel Reminds Foes That It Has Teeth [NYT], Israel's Shock and Awe by G&M's Patrick Martin.
Trying to 'teach Hamas a lesson' is fundamentally wrong by Tom Segev through corvus

All that the WaPo can think about is how this is distracting the U.S. from paying attention to Iran. Sigh.

The neighborhood bully strikes again from Haaretz.

Kucinich criticizes Israel; wants U.N. probe

Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) is calling for a United Nations investigation into Israel’s attacks on Gaza, criticizing Israel for a disproportionate response to Hamas rocket attacks.

The criticism stands in stark contrast to the statements of other Democrats, who have offered near-unanimous support for Israel amid the latest violence in the Middle East.
[...]
President-elect Obama has yet to weigh in on the violence, although top adviser David Axelrod on Sunday noted statements Obama made over the summer that respected Israel’s right to defend itself.

Why would Israel bomb a University? from E.I.

Ali Abunimah, from Electronic Intifada and reprinted in the Guardian: We have no words left:

Ehud Olmert, Israel's prime minister, pleaded that Israel wanted "quiet" - a continuation of the truce - while Hamas chose "terror", forcing him to act. But what is Israel's idea of a truce? It is very simple: Palestinians have the right to remain silent while Israel starves them, kills them and continues to violently colonise their land.

As John Ging, the head of operations for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees, said in November: "The people of Gaza did not benefit; they did not have any restoration of a dignified existence ... at the UN, our supplies were also restricted during the period of the ceasefire, to the point where we were left in a very vulnerable and precarious position and with a few days of closure we ran out of food."

That is an Israeli truce. Any act of resistance including the peaceful protests against the apartheid wall in the West Bank is always met by Israeli bullets and bombs. There are no rockets launched at Israel from the West Bank, and yet Israel's extrajudicial killings, land theft, settler pogroms and kidnappings never stopped for a day during the truce. The western-backed Palestinian Authority of Mahmoud Abbas has acceded to all Israel's demands. Under the proud eye of United States military advisors, Abbas has assembled "security forces" to fight the resistance on Israel's behalf. None of that has spared a single Palestinian in the West Bank from Israel's relentless colonisation.
[...]
Israel is no doubt emboldened by the complicity of the European Union, which this month voted again to upgrade its ties with Israel despite condemnation from its own officials and those of the UN for the "collective punishment" being visited on Gaza.
[...]
Diplomatic fronts, such as the US-dominated Quartet, continue to treat occupier and occupied, coloniser and colonised, first-world high-tech army and near-starving refugee population, as if they are on the same footing. Hope is fading that the incoming administration of Barack Obama is going to make any fundamental change to US policies that are hopelessly biased towards Israel.

With governments and international institutions failing to do their jobs, the Palestinian Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions National Committee - representing hundreds of organisations - has renewed its call on international civil society to intensify its support for the sanctions campaign modelled on the successful anti-apartheid movement.

Now is the time to channel our raw emotions into a long-term effort to make sure we do not wake up to "another Gaza" ever again.

For now, I'm waiting for Israel to mistakenly bomb a hospital.

Jim Karygiannis resigns as national campaign manager for Joe Volpe over difference of opinion on Lebanon, [thestar.com] Volpe strongly supporting Israel.

This is quite an interesting development. I can't find any positions on Ignatieff's site. Bob Rae calls for peacekeepers on the border, but we all know what issue he quite the NDP over...