On "Occupation" on Haudenosaunee land

To everyone who says "Wall Street is already occupied, it's Haudenosaunee land", I say: You CAN have an occupation on top of/within another occupation. I don't think calling it an occupation in occupied land does any disservice to First Nations, especially when dismantling capitalism would do great good to end that original occupation. So I think you're trying to score lefty points with semantics.