As a culturally sensitive vegan, I would approve of Michaëlle Jean's seal eating and hunting, if only she wasn't conflating inuit seal hunting with east coast seal hunting... So not the same thing.
Also, now she can talk about how down-with-the-common-Inuit she is cause she ate a seal heart. Unconvincing. It's like Harper (or worse, Ignatieff) wearing a hockey sweater. A trophy hunter with an entourage.
That said, and speaking of cultural sensitivity, I think 'neanderthal' might have been a bit, er, ill-considered as an outraged epithet in this context. (I think it was PETA but I forget)
As a vegan, I'm not sure how you can separate the two. Why is Inuit ("traditional") hunting acceptable, but not commercial hunting? This is the most repulsive sort of liberal, culturalist, relativism: something cannot be question because it is part of a culture? Fuck that. Rape is part of Afghani culture (and now legal!), should we withhold criticism? On what grounds do we criticize Afghans for their cultural practices but give Inuit a free ride?
They are very much the same thing: animals being slaughtered to satisfy human wants that could be satisfied in other ways. Capitalist, socialist or subsistence, it is still wrong and it should still be opposed.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2009-05-28 09:27 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2009-06-01 04:12 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Also, now she can talk about how down-with-the-common-Inuit she is cause she ate a seal heart. Unconvincing. It's like Harper (or worse, Ignatieff) wearing a hockey sweater. A trophy hunter with an entourage.
That said, and speaking of cultural sensitivity, I think 'neanderthal' might have been a bit, er, ill-considered as an outraged epithet in this context. (I think it was PETA but I forget)
(no subject)
no subject
They are very much the same thing: animals being slaughtered to satisfy human wants that could be satisfied in other ways. Capitalist, socialist or subsistence, it is still wrong and it should still be opposed.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
too busy
Re: too busy